AdBuyMCP's own vocabulary

Fidelity score

A published score out of 100 answering one question: how much of an audience definition survives translation into a channel's native targeting words. It is a property of that translation rather than a forecast, and it is not a quality rating.
what it means here

In practice, for a UK buyer

The paragraph above is the neutral answer. This is the part a vendor glossary leaves out.

AdBuyMCP's own term. Scores run from 85 on connected TV down to 40 on cinema, and both appear in the same size type, because a page that shows only its best number has explained nothing about its method. Grades run person, household, content, geo-cohort and venue, each one step further from the individual. Four of the seven channels carry a fixed constant — audio 65, addressable TV 55, DOOH 50, cinema 40 — because those vocabularies cannot express more however good the brief. Three vary across three discrete values: CTV 85, 65 or 60; search 82, 68 or 45; social 62, 48 or 38. Naming a city the UK geography table cannot map costs 15 points on every channel, and the rationale names the city.

Goes deeper: Every score, and why

same group

More on adbuymcp's own vocabulary

Six terms we either invented or use more strictly than the category does. Defined here so nobody has to guess.

All 76 terms

45 minutes. Bring a real brief and we compile it live. You describe one audience and watch it compile into seven targeting specifications, each with the score for how much of the definition survived.

Talk it through