guide · buying the awkward channels

UK media buying for B2B marketers

The committee is six to ten people. You are reaching two of them.

A considered B2B purchase, and not only a large one, is decided by a buying committee of roughly six to ten people, and most B2B media plans reach the two or three who are professionally active on LinkedIn during working hours. Reaching the rest means leaving the platforms that know job titles, which means accepting a proxy: consent-chained business segments on connected TV, household attribute combinations on addressable television, venue and daypart inference on out-of-home. Those proxies are genuinely weaker, and the useful skill is knowing how much weaker. Connected TV can carry a person-level claim at 85 out of 100 where business segments match strongly; a billboard is a geo-cohort at 50 and cannot be anything better.
Best B2B proxy
CTV, 85 / person
Addressable TV
55 / household
DOOH
50 / geo-cohort
Length
5 min read
evidenceNo campaign outcomes
Book a working session
Bring a real brief and everything described here runs against it: the compiled plans, the fidelity scores, and the question of whether the campaign can be proved at all.
Book a working session →
On this page
if you read nothing else

What to remember

The whole guide is below. These are the parts that change a decision.

  1. 01

    No channel outside the professional platforms knows a job title. Everything else is a proxy, and the honest question is how good a proxy.

  2. 02

    Connected TV is the strongest available: consent-chained intent and firmographic segments delivered against streaming households, graded person-level where the match is strong.

  3. 03

    Business audiences carry a data cost of roughly £2.50 to £3.00 per thousand impressions on top of the media, which on a narrow buy is a meaningful share of the CPM.

  4. 04

    B2B pipeline windows outlast a four-week flight, so the first campaign usually closes on response evidence rather than on closed-won revenue. Agree that before you start.

01

The committee problem

A considered B2B purchase involves an economic buyer, a champion, an operator who will live with the decision, a finance approver and usually a risk or security veto. They have different questions, different fears and different media habits, and only some of them behave like the persona your campaign was built around.

LinkedIn addresses this well for the members who are professionally active there and are reachable during the working day. It addresses it poorly for the finance approver who does not read LinkedIn, and not at all for anyone in the evening.

The alternative is not better targeting. It is different targeting with a different failure mode: reaching the household rather than the person, and accepting that some of the impressions go to people who are not in the committee at all.

02

What the proxies actually are

Connected TV is the strongest. Consent-chained marketplace segments — intent topics from company surge data, firmographic decision-maker segments — are delivered against streaming households, layered over city geography and a frequency cap. Where at least one segment matches your audience strongly, the compiled plan is graded person-level and scores 85 out of 100. Where matches are weak it drops to household at 65, and where nothing matches it falls back to geo-city household targeting at 60 rather than pretending.

Addressable television is a household proxy at 55, fixed: Experian Mosaic groups and occupation attributes intersected with postcode districts. You are buying homes whose profile over-indexes on the attribute you asked for. That score does not move however good the brief is.

Out-of-home is a property of a place rather than of a person, graded geo-cohort at 50: office buildings and rail stations at commute hours, because business professionals are known to be there. Audio sits at 65, content-level, buying the shows a business audience listens to rather than the audience itself.

03

What it costs beyond the media

Business segments are licensed data and carry a CPM uplift of roughly £2.50 on intent topics and £3.00 on firmographic segments. On a £20 media CPM that is 12.5 to 15% again, and it is the number most often missing from a proposal.

The audience is also small, which raises the media price independently. A narrow business audience in one city competes for a thin slice of inventory, and clears well above a broad national buy.

Both of these should appear on a plan before approval rather than in reconciliation afterwards. If a proposal quotes a media CPM without naming the data cost, ask for it.

04

Measuring it without pretending

The honest measurement position for B2B surround activity is that a four-week flight will not close a pipeline that takes two quarters. Agreeing what evidence the first campaign is expected to produce — before it runs — is the difference between a second campaign and a post-mortem.

What is usually achievable: deduplicated reach across the channels, observed response on your own property matched to the campaign's key, and a view of sequential exposure. What is usually not achievable in one flight: a causal claim about revenue, because the conversion volume and the window rarely power it.

The trap is accepting a last-click report at the end. It will credit search and starve the channels that created the demand search then harvested, which is precisely backwards for a surround strategy and will get the strategy cancelled.

05

What is missing, and worth knowing before you start

Account-list matching is the capability B2B marketers ask for first and it is the one we do not have: there is no CRM connector and no account-list ingestion today. Audiences are defined semantically — sector, seniority, firmographics, geography — and compiled into segments built from the same underlying data.

Account-level outcome reporting is likewise absent. You will see campaign outcomes rather than account penetration.

If matching a named account list is the whole requirement, this is not yet the tool, and saying so now is cheaper for both sides than discovering it in week two.

If the version of this that matters is the one about your own budget, that is a working session rather than a page.

Talk it through
what this guide does not claim

The limits, in the same size type as the rest

This guide describes what the channels can and cannot express for a B2B audience. It does not claim AdBuyMCP has run a B2B campaign: there are no case studies and no published outcome study, because the design-partner cohort is being recruited now. It also does not claim account-list targeting, CRM integration or account-level reporting, none of which exist here today.

If one of those limits is disqualifying, it is better established now than in week three, and a call establishes it in forty-five minutes.

Talk it through
where this came from

Every figure above, and the file it was read from

Named rather than linked. A URL nobody opened on the day it was attached is a citation in appearance only, so this names the code, the data module or the dated research report instead, and you can go and check.

  • 01Fidelity scores and grades read from the channel compilers in the product repository.
  • 02Segment data CPM uplifts from the segment catalogue in the same repository.
  • 03The buying-committee framing and the ICP gaps from our own go-to-market review.

1,097words, counted from this page rather than claimed. Where the platform’s README and its code disagree, the code wins.

// bring a brief

Everything above, run against your own audience.

Forty-five minutes. One sentence compiles into seven channel plans in front of you, with the fidelity score, the lawful-basis manifest and the measurement eligibility on screen rather than described.

Book a working session

45 minutes. Bring a real brief and we compile it live. · Design-partner phase · the sandbox needs no card and no credentials

Questions this guide gets asked

Answered in full here, and indexed alongside every other question this site answers at /faq.

Can I target job titles on CTV?

Not directly, and nobody can. What you can buy are consent-chained business segments built from job-title and intent data and delivered against streaming households. AdBuyMCP grades that person-level and scores it 85 out of 100 when the match is strong, which is the honest description of a very good proxy rather than of an exact match. A television has no idea who is in front of it.

Is a household-level proxy good enough for B2B?

It depends on your contract value and your patience. At high contract values the waste is affordable and the incremental reach is the point; at low ones it is not. The useful discipline is to decide in advance what evidence would justify a second campaign, because a B2B surround strategy judged on last-click after four weeks will always look like a failure regardless of whether it worked.