channel · Cinema

Cinema

The lowest fidelity score on the site.

Cinema compiles to a venue and film projection: DCM audience and genre packs, plus a venue list built from your persona's postcode districts. We grade it venue-level and score it 40 out of 100 — the lowest score in the system, published in the same size type as the 85 on CTV, because if you only see the good number you learn nothing about the method. Two honest notes. A cinema buy involves no personal data at all, so it sits outside UK GDPR scope, which is in your favour. And the Acorn catchment licence that would make the venue ranking real is not held, so the catchment over-index figures on a sandbox booking brief are fixtures rather than data.
Fidelity
40 / venue, fixed
GDPR scope
No personal data
Plan floor
£500 / week
Supply rails
2 named
stageDesign-partner phase
what happens next
45 minutes. Bring a real brief and we compile it live.
Book a working session
fidelity

Fixed at 40 out of 100

One band from the compiler, whatever audience detail the brief carries, because the vocabulary this channel compiles into cannot express more than this. Geography is the only thing that changes it, and it can only subtract: a city the UK table cannot map takes fifteen points off.

the only band
40/ 100
venue-level

Venue/film projection: DCM audience packs + venues whose catchments over-index target Acorn/Mosaic types. No personal data — outside UK GDPR scope.

when you get it

Standard, and the only band. A cinema screen has no idea who bought the ticket.

on every channel, including this one

Naming a city the UK geography table cannot map costs 15 points here as it does everywhere else, and the rationale on the plan names the city rather than dropping it quietly. That penalty applies on top of the bands above.

vocabulary

What your audience actually becomes here

Each row is a table the compiler matches your persona against, with the provider behind it and the basis the lawful-basis manifest records. The language model extracts the semantics from your brief; these deterministic tables emit the identifiers, which is why a hallucinated segment cannot reach a buy.

Targeting inputProviderLawful basis
DCM audience packs
ABC1 Adults · Premium London
Digital Cinema MediaOutside UK GDPR scope
DCM genre packs
Sci-fi & action · Drama & awards
Digital Cinema MediaOutside UK GDPR scope
Upmarket venue packs
Everyman and Curzon circuits
Pearl & DeanOutside UK GDPR scope
Catchment ranking
Intended: venues ranked by catchment over-index. Today: venue ids are built from the persona's postcode districts, and the over-index figures printed on a booking brief are deterministic sandbox fixtures.
CACI Acorn — licence pending, not in the product todayOutside UK GDPR scope

Examples are drawn from the sandbox-scale slices of each taxonomy the platform ships with. The full exports load into the same shapes, so catalogue size does not change the compiler behaviour or the fidelity grade. Nothing here has yet run against a full production catalogue, because nothing has run live.

how it compiles

From one sentence to a Cinema targeting spec

The persona is matched against the cinema pack catalogue, and the resulting packs are combined with a venue list derived from the persona's first eight postcode districts. Flights default to two weeks, because that is how cinema is sold. No personal data enters the specification at any point, which is why this is the one channel whose lawful-basis manifest is trivial.

the rule underneath

The model never emits a vendor segment id. It extracts semantics from your brief — what kind of person, what interests, what geography, what intent — and deterministic registry code matches those against catalogue keywords to produce known identifiers. That is what makes a compiled plan auditable line by line, and what stops a hallucinated segment reaching a buy.

The fastest way to see this is a real brief compiled live in the session rather than a worked example.

Talk it through
supply

The rails that reach this channel

4 of the 25 connectors the platform registers touch Cinema. Each one is graded on our own evidence ledger, which is deliberately blunt: a mocked HTTP test proves a client was written, not that a vendor accepted the request, spent money, or returned real delivery.

2Stub2Client built

Vistar MediaBuying API

Stub

DOOH and cinema supply. Sandbox planning data only.

What has to happen next
There is no live client. Forecast, activate, pause, creative submission, reporting and inventory listing all throw before any request. Vistar publishes no stable normalised reporting schema, and creative submission needs an advertiser domain, IAB categories, publisher scope and OpenRTB markup the current shape cannot carry.
Getting access
An approved trafficking seat plus separate bidder approval. Partner access, not developer signup.

Digital Cinema MediaBooking workflow

Client built

Generates the UK cinema booking brief with audience and genre packs, drives the clearance step, and holds the IO state machine.

What has to happen next
Ingest and reconcile the first authoritative sales-house delivery statement. These rails automate the paperwork; they do not make the booking and they do not report the delivery. In live mode a report pull throws rather than fabricating rows, and a pause requires sales-house acknowledgement.

Pearl & DeanBooking workflow

Client built

The same booking automation for the cinema circuits DCM does not carry.

What has to happen next
Ingest and reconcile the first authoritative sales-house delivery statement.

CACIAudience data

Stub

Acorn classifications, intended for ranking cinema and DOOH catchments.

What has to happen next
A CACI data licence. No Acorn data is in the product: the stub's scores are deterministic pseudo-random output, and cinema venue ids are constructed from postcode districts rather than from a licensed catchment dataset.

Named on this channel's compiled plans: Digital Cinema Media · Pearl & Dean. Across all 25 connectors, spend-tested stands at 0 and report-verified at 0, and a continuous-integration check keeps those two counts honest.

The whole supply matrix →
creative

What Cinema will take

Formats and the limits the product enforces on this channel. Where a limit is a schema constraint, over-long copy fails at the edge rather than being silently truncated on the way to a provider.

DCP

2K flat, 1998×1080, 24fps, 5.1 audio, 60 seconds maximum.

Clearance

Routed via DCM Cinemapper with a CAA clearance certificate before print traffic. The workflow holds the state; it does not advance on a timer.

Storyboard

Generated for the cinema aspect and duration rather than reused from the CTV cut.

Asset production is charged separately and never blended into the media fee. The creative studio, in full

measurement

What Cinema can prove, and what it cannot

Cinema exposure is modelled at postcode-sector level, which in principle gives frequency deduplication against DOOH in the same catchment. What it cannot give you is a person-level exposure record, and no cinema seller in the UK can. Delivery arrives through the reconcile step of the booking workflow, and no cinema delivery statement has yet been ingested here.

Provider delivery, observed response, modelled estimates and powered causal evidence stay visibly separate on the report rather than being averaged into one number, and the geo-lift engine returns an underpowered verdict instead of a lift figure when the spend cannot carry the test. The four verbs, in full

Sources that read this channel
Plausible AnalyticsClient built

Your own site's analytics, read through your token, so brand response is measured on data you already own and can audit.

Google Analytics 4Client built

GA4 as an alternative brand-response source where that is what the advertiser already runs.

CintStub

Brand-lift survey panels, intended for the fourth measurement verb.

the limit

What this will not pretend past.

Every one of the seven channel pages carries one of these, in the same type. The best this channel scores is 40, graded venue-level, and the paragraph beside this is what that score does not cover.

Cinema was around £220m in the UK in 2025 on AA/WARC figures: small, and volatile. It is a distinctive attention product and a poor recurring-revenue wedge. We are emphatically not "the first self-serve cinema" — DCM has run a campaign planner and established buying workflows for years, and the claim is one we have explicitly retired. Cinema here is a booking-paperwork workflow with an eighteen-day lead time, no cinema delivery has ever been reconciled through it, and the Acorn licence behind the catchment ranking is not held. What is different is cinema inside a neutral cross-channel plan with a common audience definition and a common report.

If that limit is disqualifying for your budget, we would rather you heard it in the session than after the invoice.

Talk it through
// bring a brief

See what your audience compiles to on Cinema.

Forty-five minutes. Bring a real audience and we compile it live on Cinema and the other six, with the score and the lawful-basis manifest on screen.

Book a working session

Design-partner phase · the sandbox needs no card and no credentials · nothing here sells self-serve media

Cinema questions

Why publish a score of 40?

Because it is the true one, and because a page that only publishes the 85 is a page that has told you nothing about how the other six were arrived at. A venue projection is genuinely worth about 40 out of 100 as a representation of a named audience. It can still be an excellent buy — a full screen with the lights down has an attention profile nothing else on this list matches — and those two facts are not in conflict.

Is cinema really outside GDPR?

The targeting is. Nothing personal enters a cinema specification: it is audience packs, genre packs and venue catchments, all of them aggregate. That is why this channel's lawful-basis manifest is the shortest of the seven. Your own measurement of the campaign may involve personal data, and that is covered separately.